Saturday, February 29, 2020

AP World History, How to write CCOT Essay

The spread of Buddhism and development of Neo-Confucianism represented cultural changes in China. Buddhist monasteries gained political and economic influence through acting as advisors to rulers and through generous grants of land. Empress Wu, a ruler during the Tang Dynasty, used Buddhist principles to rule and was considered a Bodhisattva by Buddhists. Pure Land Buddhism offered the promise of a better afterlife while Chen Buddhism emphasized meditation. The increased popularity of Buddhism in China was a result of the political and economic chaos following the decline of the Han. Buddhism was a salvation doctrine that offered succor to the poor and oppressed. Increasing numbers of sons in the gentry class dropped out of society and became monks, which led to an anti-Buddhist backlash during the Song period. Chinese leadership transitioned from the Han through the Tang. After the fall of the Han there was a period of disunity and chaos called the Three Kingdoms period. Eventually, the Sui asserted their rule, building the Grand Canal and invading Korea and Japan. When the Sui fell due to overexpansion, the Tang took power and established a cosmopolitan rule, extending Chinese territory over the Silk Road and integrating central Asian cultural elements such as Polo and wearing pants. The fall of the Han was caused primarily by pressure from outside invaders on China’s Northwest border – the Great Wall proved ineffective. The re-establishment of dynastic rule resulted from core Chinese values inherent in the Dynastic Cycle and Mandate of Heaven. The effects of the Fall of the Han and subsequent rise of the Sui and Tang Dynasties was cultural change as outside cultures influenced China, including the influence of Indian Buddhism and central-Asian nomadic culture. Confucianism was a cultural continuity throughout the time period. The Han had established the Confucian exam system although test-taking was limited to members of the elite. Under the Sui and Tang the examination system became an important way to establish merit-based government, and examinees were responsible for memorizing and analyzing the Confucian classics. Confucianism and later neo-Confucianism clearly defined the relationship between husband and wife, as evidenced in the â€Å"Three Submissions† women were supposed to obey. Even during the heyday of Buddhist influence, Confucian ideals about the family and roles in society influenced many or the elite and peasant class. Ultimately, Confucianism re-asserted itself in the form of Neo-Confucianism, which incorporated elements of Daoism and Buddhism, and Buddhist influence was squelched. As a result Buddhism is a tiny minority religion in China today, while Confucian values continued through later dynasties. Globally, salvation religions were spreading rapidly during this period as classical empires fell and insecurity became widespread. Christianity was similarly making headway Western Europe, as the collapse of the Roman Empire led to chaos and disruption.

Wednesday, February 12, 2020

Research an aircraft Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1750 words

Research an aircraft - Essay Example raft is a combination of advanced aeronautics, electronics, and is the pinnacle of maritime multirole fighter aircraft; which is why I have chosen the F/A-18 Hornet. The F/A-18 Hornet was developed by McDonald Douglas in order to fulfill the US Navy’s requirement of an advanced carrier borne multirole fighter. The ageing fleet of the US carrier aircraft consisted of the F-14 Tomcat, A-4 Skyhawk, A-7 Corsair and the F-4 Phantom II; these aircrafts were unable to adapt to the fast paced developing world of maritime warfare.2 This was evident from the casualties that were suffered in the Vietnam War at the hands of the MiG-17 and MiG-21 fighters. Furthermore, an aircraft with longer range, higher payload and better avionics was needed to complement and replace the ageing F-14 Tomcat.1 This is where the F/A-18 Hornet was introduced. The development of the F/A-18 was brought about as a result of pressure from the congress to attain carrier aircrafts to supplement the F-14 Tomcat. The US Navy initiated the experimental Naval Fighter-Attack (VFAX) program to seek the desperately required aircraft. However, in August 1973 the congress urged the Navy to pursue a low cost alternative to the F-14.2 The United States Navy consulted with the Grumman Aircraft Engineering Corporation and McDonnell Douglas for proposals. Both proposed aircrafts that were as expensive as the F-14. Alongside these developments, the air force was filtering companies to design aircrafts for their Light Weight Fighter (LWF) program. The Air Force for its LWF program decided upon two companies; the Northop and General Dynamics. Both companies lead on to manufacture YF-17 and YF-16 respectively. The US Congress and Senate and House of Representatives of Armed Forces Committees insisted that the Navy chose the YF-16 from the Air Forces LWF program; just as the Air Force had done. However, the Navy was keener towards designing and manufacturing of their own aircraft, which would be tailored for their

Saturday, February 1, 2020

Critically discuss the law governing unilateral mistake in relation to Essay

Critically discuss the law governing unilateral mistake in relation to the identity of the other contracting party - Essay Example Lindsay & Co knew of a business named as 'Blenkiron & Co', and knew them to be reputable and residing at the address represented. Under this guise, and the rogue's signing of his letters as 'Blenkiron & Co', Lindsay & Co sold the rogue a large order of handkerchiefs. Blenkarn then sold the goods - 250 dozen linen handkerchiefs - to an innocent third party, Cundy. Cundy sued Lindsay & Co for conversion of the goods. The lower court held that Lindsay could not recover the handkerchiefs from Cundy. Blackburn J,. They reasoned: â€Å"The rule of law has been thoroughly established—the cases are numerous, and I need not cite them—that where a contract is voidable on the ground of fraud, you may avoid it, so long as the goods remain in the man's hands who is guilty of the fraud, or in the hands of anybody who takes them from him with notice; but where a person has bona fide acquired an interest in the goods, you cannot, as against that person, avoid the contract. Where the g oods have come into the hands of a bona fide purchaser you cannot take them back†. The Appellate court affirmed in part and ruled that Lindsay & Co had meant to deal only with Blenkiron & Co. There could therefore had been no agreement or contract between them and the rogue. Accordingly, title did not pass to the rogue, and could not have passed to Cundy. They were forced to therefore return the goods. Where the lower court held there was a voidable contract with the rogue, the Appellate court ruled there was no contract with the defrauding party at all and therefore no third party remedy. A different result was reached in another case.iii where a similar situation occurred. Here however, the company name that the rogue used did not exist, as it did in Cundy v Lindsay. A rogue called Wallis pretended to be an imaginary firm which he called 'Hallam & Co.' and had pretentious notepaper bearing that name printed. He ordered goods from the plaintiffs by writing to them on this not epaper and they sent the goods to him. He then sold the goods to the defendant. The claim was denied. Wallis' personality could not have affected the minds of the plaintiffs - if they were willing to give credit to 'Hallam & Co.', a non-existent entity, they were willing to give it to anyone. Though there was fraud, there was no operative mistake. Therefore the contract was merely voidable for fraud, and the third party obtained good title to the goods. In Phillips v Brooks (1919] 2 KB 243) A man entered the plaintiff’s shop and asked to see some pearls and some rings. He selected pearls at the price of ?2550 and a ring at the price of ?450 He produced a cheque book and wrote out a cheque for ?3000 In signing it, he said: ‘You see who I am, I am Sir George Bullough,’ and he gave an address in St. James’s Square. The plaintiff knew that there was such a person as Sir George Bullough, and finding on reference to a directory that Sir George lived at the addre ss mentioned, he said, ‘Would you like to take the articles with you?’ to which the man replied: ‘You had better have the cheque cleared first, but I should like to take the ring as it is my wife’s birthday tomorrow,’ whereupon the plaintiff let him have the ring. The cheque was dishonoured, the person who gave it being in fact a fraudulent person named North who was subsequently convicted of obtaining the ring by false pretences. In the meantime, North, in the name of Firth, had pledged the ring with the defendants who, bona